Mt6762d что за процессор
Выпуская мобильный процессор MediaTek Helio P22 (MT6762, он же (MTK6762), тайваньская компания нацелилась на создание решения для бюджетных смартфонов с поддержкой особо вытянутых экранов с соотношением сторон 9 к 20. На данный момент подобные дисплеи уже успели прочно войти в моду.
Стремясь идти в ногу со временем, MediaTek добавила свежую версию Bluetooth 5.0, которая позволяет передавать данные на куда большей скорости, чем 4.x, и предоставляет ряд полезных «плюшек» для работы с носимыми гаджетами и прочими беспроводными аксессуарами.
Интересно, что вместо графического ускорителя от ARM для Helio P22 был выбран GPU IMG PowerVR GE8320. С точки зрения скорости и энергопотребления данное решение более интересно. Однако в итоге максимальное разрешение экрана составляет только 720×1600 пикселей.
Этого может показаться довольно мало, но следует учитывать, что MediaTek Helio P22 ориентирован на скорее бюджетные смартфоны, хотя и сделан на основе чипсета начальной средней ценовой категории.
Сравнения с конкурентами
Specifications:
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Общая информация
Дата анонса | Май 2018 года |
Класс | Средний класс |
Номер модели | MT6762R |
Официальный сайт | Сайт MediaTek Helio P22 |
Комментарии
Нормальный проц . У меня Motorola Moto E6 Plus версия с 2 гигами оперативной памяти и вот этот процессор MediaTek Helio P22 в пабг на средних настройках спокойно играю.
Если вам предложат купить смартфон на helio p22 то лучше либо докинуть 1к рублей и посмотреть что-то помощнее т.к. этот проц в realme c2 не сказать что справляется с9 андроидом.
Xiaomi Redmi 6. После почти 2-х лет использование начал быстро разряжаться и подторможивать, ладно тут всё печально по "Производительность CPU" и "Производительность в играх" это откинем ладно, но вот "Энергоэффективность" это да, после стольких лет использования не замечаешь, что он заслуживает 55 баллов, ну тут максимум 40 с чём-то, точно не 55. Самый ужасный процессор который я видел. Я бы его сравнил с MT6739.
Исправляюсь и извиняюсь. Просто, я не разобрался в чём дело, быстрого разряда батареи. Оказывается, дело не в чипсете, а в самой батареи. Так как, после 2-х лет использования смартфона, емкость аккумулятора села очень сильно, и из-за этого происходит быстрый разряд. И стоит добавить, что дисплей IPS, а не OLED или AMOLED. Ну и поговорю о процессоре. На середину 2018 года, это был топ, а сейчас, в 2021 году, это «дерьмовый» бюджетник.
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 on one side and the MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.8GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
GeekBench 5
Image compression | 23.95 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 4.81 images/s |
Speech recognition | 8.82 words/s |
Machine learning | 5.31 images/s |
Camera shooting | 2.51 images/s |
HTML 5 | 0.59 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 150.25 Krows/s |
Центральный процессор
Смартфоны
Смартфоны с Helio P22 | AnTuTu v9 |
---|---|
1. Nokia 3.1 Plus | - |
2. Sony Xperia L3 | - |
3. Vivo Y91c | 112464 |
4. Huawei Honor 9A | 112142 |
5. ZTE Blade 11 Prime | 111713 |
6. Sony Xperia L4 | 111462 |
7. Huawei Y6p | 109069 |
8. Nokia 2.4 | 109008 |
9. Huawei Y5p | 105855 |
10. Oppo A1k | 104703 |
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
AnTuTu - Total score | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 93,000 |
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 92,065 |
The difference is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
Android PassMark - CPU Mark | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 1,388 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 1,314 |
The difference in performance is 6%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 716 3,457 |
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 753 3,278 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 153 787 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 146 764 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Оперативная память
Тип памяти | LPDDR4X |
Частота памяти | 1600 МГц |
Шина | 2x 16 Бит |
Пропускная способность | До 11.92 Гбит/сек |
Объем | До 6 ГБ |
Производительность
Redmi 6, как наиболее распространенный аппарат на основе Helio P22, можно использовать в качестве «эталона» для оценки производительности MT6762. Так, в популярном бенчмарке GeekBench он оценивается в среднем в 820 баллов в однопоточном режиме и 3600 — во многопоточном.
«Минимальная» модификация данного устройства, имеющая 3 Gb оперативной памяти и встроенный накопитель емкостью 32 Gb была оценена в 70300 очков в другом популярном приложении для тестирования скорости смартфонов — AnTuTu. Что, в целом, весьма неплохо для бюджетного уровня.
Specifications:
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the PDT of MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 is lower. The MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
AnTuTu - Total score | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 | 122,242 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 93,000 |
The difference is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
Android PassMark - CPU Mark | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 | 1,946 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 1,314 |
The difference in performance is 48%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 | 1,332 4,793 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 716 3,457 |
In single core, the difference is 86%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 | 274 1,173 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 146 764 |
In single core, the difference is 88%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Производительность
Redmi 6, как наиболее распространенный аппарат на основе Helio P22, можно использовать в качестве «эталона» для оценки производительности MT6762. Так, в популярном бенчмарке GeekBench он оценивается в среднем в 820 баллов в однопоточном режиме и 3600 — во многопоточном.
«Минимальная» модификация данного устройства, имеющая 3 Gb оперативной памяти и встроенный накопитель емкостью 32 Gb была оценена в 70300 очков в другом популярном приложении для тестирования скорости смартфонов — AnTuTu. Что, в целом, весьма неплохо для бюджетного уровня.
Performances :
Performance comparison between this processor and those of equivalent power, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison on the AnTuTu benchmark platform for mobile devices:
AnTuTu - Total score | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 104,913 |
Amlogic S905X4 | 101,519 |
MediaTek MT8166 | 96,188 |
MediaTek MT6762R Helio P22 | 95,000 |
MediaTek MT8168B | 93,681 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 93,000 |
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 92,065 |
MediaTek MT8788V | 91,598 |
MediaTek MT8768 | 91,270 |
MediaTek MT8168 | 91,045 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
Performance comparison on the Passmark benchmark platform for processors:
Android PassMark - CPU Mark | |
---|---|
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 1,941 |
Samsung Exynos 850 | 1,729 |
MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 1,644 |
MediaTek MT8768T Helio P22T | 1,626 |
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 1,388 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 1,314 |
MediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 | 1,023 |
Unisoc Tiger T606 | 935 |
MediaTek MT8768 | 852 |
NXP i.MX 8M Plus | 838 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 4 with Android operating system.
Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT8768N | 889 4,215 |
MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 874 4,096 |
MediaTek MT6765H Helio G37 | 858 3,614 |
MediaTek MT8768T Helio P22T | 819 3,600 |
MediaTek MT8768 | 763 3,489 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 716 3,457 |
Samsung Exynos 2200 | 1,073 3,389 |
Amlogic S922XJ | 1,218 3,342 |
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 753 3,278 |
MediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 | 693 3,204 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android: performance comparison in Geekbench 5 with Android operating system.
Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
---|---|
MediaTek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 | 171 958 |
MediaTek MT8768T Helio P22T | 152 849 |
MediaTek MT6765G Helio G35 | 162 790 |
MediaTek MT6762V Helio A25 | 153 787 |
Amlogic S922XJ | 227 767 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 | 146 764 |
MediaTek MT8768N | 147 697 |
MediaTek MT6762G Helio G25 | 142 694 |
MediaTek MT8168B | 167 571 |
MediaTek MT5893 | 193 565 |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 on one side and the Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.8GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Графический ускоритель
GPU | PowerVR GE8320 |
Архитектура | Rogue |
Частота GPU | 650 МГц |
Вычислительных блоков | 2 |
Шейдерных блоков | 64 |
FLOPS | 41 Гфлопс |
Версия Vulcan | 1.1 |
Версия OpenCL | 1.2 |
Версия DirectX | 11 |
MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 Specs
Specifications of the MediaTek MT6762D Helio P22 processor dedicated to the smartphone sector, it has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.8GHz. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the maximum capacity of RAM memory that we can get, the type of compatible memory, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in the Passmark platform, Cinebench R23 and Geekbench 5.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
AnTuTu 9
CPU | 33105 |
GPU | 14660 |
Memory | 21976 |
UX | 31863 |
Total score | 101798 |
Мультимедиа (ISP)
Нейронный процессор | CorePilot |
Тип накопителя | eMMC 5.1 |
Макс. разрешение дисплея | 1600 x 720 |
Макс. разрешение фотокамеры | 1x 21МП, 2x 13МП |
Запись видео | 1K при 30FPS |
Воспроизведение видео | 1080p при 30FPS |
Поддержка кодеков | H.264, H.265 |
Аудио | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Тесты в бенчмарках
Связь и сети
Поддержка 4G | LTE Cat. 7 |
Поддержка 5G | Нет |
Скорость скачивания | До 300 Мбит/с |
Скорость загрузки | До 150 Мбит/с |
Wi-Fi | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 |
Навигация | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Технические характеристики
Смартфоны на базе Helio P22
Первые смартфоны на основе MediaTek Helio P22 (MT6762) появились летом 2018 года. Наиболее яркий представитель — Xiaomi Redmi 6, который получил «полноэкранный дизайн», обладает неплохой производительностью и при этом стоит всего 120 евро. Что неплохо по нынешним временам.
Другие представители (в ближайшее время список будет активно пополняться):
MediaTek Helio P22 - восьмиядерный чипсет, который был анонсирован 22 мая 2018 года и изготовляется по 12-нанометровому техпроцессу. Он имеет 4 ядра Cortex-A53 на 2000 МГц и 4 ядра Cortex-A53 на 1500 МГц.
Specifications:
Читайте также: