Abbyy finereader и adobe acrobat в чем разница
Программное обеспечение для распознавания текстов ABBYY FineReader поддерживает более 195 языков. Для некоторых из них поддерживается проверка орфографии и пунктуации, а также некоторые другие функции.
Одни из наиболее популярных языков среди пользователей на территории СНГ — английский и русский. Давайте рассмотрим, какой из них выбрать для конкретных случаев, какие вы получите при этом возможности и функционал.
FineReader английский и русский: различия и сходства
Итак, все предельно просто — английскую версию выбираем для работы с англоязычными документами, русскую — с русскоязычными.
Английский FineReader будет полезен:
- Тем, кто работает с иностранными клиентами или партнерами.
- Изучающим язык и использующим для этого англоязычные источники. Здесь вам может пригодиться поддержка английского словаря с транскрипциями.
- Переводчикам, которым приходится по долгу службы обрабатывать большие объемы документации.
- Техническим писателям, занимающимся написанием инструкций и мануалов на основе исходников от зарубежных производителей.
И это далеко не полный перечень…
Во всех перечисленных случаях с помощью FineReader вы сможете преобразовывать сканы, фотографии, электронные документы (PDF, DjVu и других форматов) в редактируемый вид для дальнейшего перевода на русский или для редактирования.
Что касается русского FineReader, возможности по его применению аналогичные. Программа подходит для распознавания текста, банковских, страховых и иных формализованных документов, перевода в редактируемый формат старых книг и документации. Особенность русскоязычного модуля — поддержка 3 словарей: русский, со старой орфографией и с ударениями.
Что общего между FineReader русским и английским
Из более чем 190 языков, поддерживаемых «ФайнРидером», только для 42 реализована словарная поддержка (проверка орфографии, пунктуации и пр.). русский и английский входят в этот список.
Также в ПО реализована функция сравнения текстов. Языков, для которых доступна такая возможность, еще меньше. Их 35. Опять же, и English, и Русский входят в этот перечень.
При работе с обоими языками программа может распознавать простые математические формулы.
Объединяет их и возможность работы с разными входными форматами. Независимо от выбранного языка, FineReader распознает все виды PDF, более 10 форматов графических файлов, сканы с TWAIN- и WIA-сканеров, информацию из 10+ текстовых форматов.
В общем, при выборе нужно отталкиваться только от языка. Функционал и возможности ABBYY FineReader на русском и английском идентичны — даже шире, чем для множества других, поддерживаемых программой.
ABBYY® FineReader® PDF 15 сочетает в себе лидирующие технологии распознавания ABBYY OCR и широкий набор инструментов для работы с различными типами PDF и бумажными документами. И все это по доступной цене. Вы можете создавать, редактировать, согласовывать, сравнивать и защищать документы, а также конвертировать их в редактируемые форматы.
Почему миллионы пользователей выбирают FineReader PDF 15
Обратите внимание на ABBYY FineReader PDF 15, если вы ищете доступный по цене PDF-редактор с поддержкой тех же базовых возможностей для работы с документами, что и в Adobe® Acrobat®.
Максимум возможностей PDF-файлов
Возможность локальной или сетевой установки в зависимости от типа лицензирования
Непревзойденное качество распознавания благодаря лидирующим технологиям ABBYY OCR
Удобный и интуитивно понятный интерфейс
Несколько типов лицензий для корпоративного использования
Прогрессивная система скидок в зависимости от количества закупаемых лицензий
ABBYY FineReader PDF 15 - список функциональных возможностей
Ознакомьтесь с подробным перечнем функциональных возможностей ABBYY FineReader PDF 15.
ABBYY FineReader PDF 15 - список функциональных возможностей
FineReader PDF для Windows
Редакции
Standard 1
Свяжитесь с менеджером, чтобы получить подробную информацию
Business
Свяжитесь с менеджером, чтобы получить подробную информацию
Corporate
Свяжитесь с менеджером, чтобы получить подробную информацию
Лицензирование
Лицензирование для организаций
Наши менеджеры помогут подобрать оптимальный вариант в зависимости от объемов и особенностей предполагаемого использования программы и специфики ИТ-инфраструктуры организации.
1 Предназначается только для домашнего использования.
Наши партнеры в области онлайн-коммерции обеспечат безопасность вашего платежа.
С 2007 года ABBYY состоит
в PDF Association
The computer center of a university was looking for a suitable PDF software to replace Adobe Acrobat for all members who work with documents. They found the solution, ABBYY FineReader PDF 15, and acquired a campus license.
Case study: German university chooses ABBYY FineReader PDF over Adobe Acrobat
As an information technology (IT) service provider and a cooperative partner for the science and administration departments, the computing center of this university supports two thousand employees in their tasks ranging from research, lecture preparations, and administrative activities. Together with the decentralized IT managers, and in dialogue with the users, the data center supports the progressive change and digitization of the university in all areas and disciplines.
We were looking for an alternative to Adobe Acrobat—and found ABBYY FineReader PDF, which is much more cost-effective than Acrobat, and proved to be as versatile and productive for our university staff.
University representative
Challenge
- The university was looking for a suitable replacement for Adobe Acrobat.
- They required a versatile solution for all employees.
Solution
- FineReader PDF fulfills all the portable document format (PDF) editing and optical character recognition (OCR) capture requirements that the administration and academic staff desired.
- The uncomplicated provision of a campus license for all employees of the university meets the requirements of the computing center.
- The learning curve for the easy-to-use PDF and OCR solution FineReader PDF was low, and the software is well favored by the university staff.
Value
- One universal solution for various document tasks in academic and administrative work.
- ABBYY Support and FineReader Development teams provided quick and competent support to meet the university employees’ unique requirements.
- As a result of the Campus Licenses program, the university was able to significantly reduce the total cost of ownership of a PDF and document conversion solution.
Campus Licenses: Tailored for educational organizations
With ABBYY Campus Licenses, specifically tailored for universities and schools, educational institutions can deploy ABBYY FineReader PDF across all institutionally owned PCs in schools or campuses of various sizes. Campus Licenses offer educational institutions exceptional value for campus-wide usage.
Exceptional value and flexibility for institutions of different sizes
With tiered subscription plans, Campus Licenses offer flexible and cost-efficient options for academic institutions to suit budgets ranging from smaller schools to large universities. There is no need to define the exact number of licenses—choose a range and install as many copies as needed within the selected range. Add more installations (within the range) as usage grows. Change the range as needed annually when renewing subscriptions for the following year.
With Campus Licenses, installation is done in the simplest way possible. Any user can use FineReader PDF installed on computers in public places such as classrooms, libraries, etc.
Up to date with the latest improvements
Subscription plans for Campus Licenses include Software Maintenance and Upgrade Assurance, which always keeps you equipped with the most recent FineReader PDF updates and technical support.
PDF editing and conversion for both Windows and Mac
With the Campus Licenses offer, both FineReader PDF 15 for Windows and FineReader PDF for Mac are available, making it ideal for educational organizations using devices of both types across their campuses.
Let’s have a side-by-side comparison of ABBYY FineReader vs Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams to find out which one is better. This software comparison between ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams is based on genuine user reviews. Compare software prices, features, support, ease of use, and user reviews to make the best choice between these, and decide whether ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams fits your business.
ABBYY FineReader
Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams
Pricing
Rs. 17612
Rs. 16142
Industries
Features
Reviews
4.5
4.2
4.5
4.6
Likelihood to Recommend
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
Likelihood to Recommend
Screenshots
Pros & Cons
Pros
“Provides excellent optical character recognition of scanned documents.”
Posted - Jan 09, 2019
Pros
“Easily open pdf files, read and edit them at a go. Able to convert them to different formats as per my requirement.”
Posted - Aug 12, 2020
Platform
A Quick Comparison Between ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams
Let’s have a detailed comparison of ABBYY FineReader vs Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams to find out which one is better. Let’s discover some of the essential factors that you must consider and decide whether ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams fits your business.
Comparison of ABBYY FineReader vs Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams In terms of Features
ABBYY FineReader includes features like Convert PDFs and Scans, Bulk Conversion, PDF Editor and Layout Setting. Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams is known for functionalities like Scanning, Take your PDF tools to go, Adobe PDFs are smarter and E-Signatures. When you compare ABBYY FineReader vs Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams, look for scalability, customization, ease of use, customer support and other key factors. The one which suits your business needs is the best.
Comparison Between ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams In terms of Deployment Type
While ABBYY FineReader supports On Premises deployment; Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams is suitable for Web Based deployment. While selecting between ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams, figure out which one of the two is compatible with your devices. This will help in reducing the hassle after implementation.
ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams: Which Is Ideal for Your Industry
ABBYY FineReader is ideal for industries like All Industries. For All Industries, Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams is a better choice. If you are confused between ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams, you can also check if the software has customizable modules for your industry. Industry-specific functionalities will ensure higher efficiency and ROI. However, do check for the hidden price, is any.
Which Is Better? - ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams
ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams can be used for different purposes and are well-suited for teams with specific needs. If you are looking for a platform that is easy to use, has low barriers to entry, and offers a lot of customization, flexibility, and integration options, then you must compare their specifications in detail at the time of demo. Compare ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams during demo to decide which one is best for your business.
Is ABBYY FineReader better than Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams?
While ABBYY FineReader offers customized features, Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams has diverse modules. Select between ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams as per your business needs.
Are ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams same?
Both these products offer similar features but with a different approach. While ABBYY FineReader emphasizes on user experiences, Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams focuses on functionalities.
Which is better ABBYY FineReader or Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams?
It all depends on the functionalities that you prefer. While ABBYY FineReader offers add-ons along with essential features, Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams emphasizes on customization.
Is ABBYY FineReader the same as Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams?
No, the difference between ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams lies in terms of features and functionalities. While ABBYY FineReader can be customized as per the user’s needs, Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams addresses the diverse audience.
Can ABBYY FineReader replace Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams?
It depends upon your business requirement. Both ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams provides standard features to cater diverse industry needs.
What is the difference between ABBYY FineReader and Adobe Acrobat Pro DC for teams?
The difference lies in terms of the user interface and functionalities. While ABBYY FineReader is customizable, ABBYY FineReader offers comprehensive modules.
A very common request that I get here at DocumentSnap is to compare the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capabilities of ABBYY FineReader with Adobe Acrobat. Why? Well, for starters, both of them come included with models the Fujitsu ScanSnap as well as other scanners.
I decided to do a quick test comparing the OCR of the two packages using the following criteria:
- OCR Speed
- Resulting File Size
- Accuracy
The Hardware
For a scanner I used my ScanSnap S1300.
I used two computers for the test:
- Windows: A new cheap Acer laptop with a Core i3 2.40 GHz processor and 4 GB RAM running Windows 7
- Mac: An old 2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro with 4 GB RAM running Mac OS X Snow Leopard
The Software
Here are the packages I used:
- Windows: ABBYY FineReader For ScanSnap 4.1 (called from ScanSnap Manager) vs. Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro
- Mac: ABBYY FineReader For ScanSnap 4.1 (run standalone) vs. Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
Yes, I realize that Adobe Acrobat X is out, but since I am not aware of any scanners that come bundled with it yet, I decided to stick with the versions that ship with the ScanSnap. I’ll update Acrobat X in a later post.
The Document
I scanned a magazine article for this test. It probably would have been better to do this with a bunch of different documents to compare, but hey.
In all cases except one, I scanned without OCR so that I could run it standalone later. Here’s some info on the document that I used:
Maybe I am blind, but I couldn’t figure out a way to run ABBYY FineReader for ScanSnap on Windows standalone. If you know how, please leave a message in the comments. In that test, I re-scanned with “Create Searchable PDF” checked in the ScanSnap Manager settings.
The Settings
I tried not to do too many fancy settings to keep things as “real-life” as possible. There were essentially three configurations:
ABBYY FineReader
I set Save Mode to “Text under page image” and Quality to High. These were the settings for the Mac ABBYY, and I believe it is what ScanSnap Manager on Windows uses as well.
Adobe Acrobat (Normal)
I set the output style to “Searchable Image (Exact)” because leaving it just as Searchable Image in my experience has caused some weird things to happen with the resulting PDF. I used these settings on both Windows and Mac.
Adobe Acrobat (With ClearScan)
In Acrobat 9 there is a setting called ClearScan. I used that as an additional test to see what the difference is.
Speed
Windows
- ABBYY Windows: 20.5 seconds
- Acrobat 9: 13.9 seconds
- Acrobat 9 With Clearscan: 17.6 seconds
Winner: Acrobat!
Since they are different machines, you can’t directly compare the Windows and Mac times, but clearly in both cases Acrobat is faster.
File Size
The non-OCR’ed PDF was 1.5 MB.
Windows
- ABBYY Windows: 1.7 MB (+.2 MB)
- Acrobat 9: 1.5 MB (same)
- Acrobat 9 With ClearScan: 315 KB (-1.16 MB)
- ABBYY Mac: 1.4 MB (-.1 MB)
- Acrobat 8: 1.5 MB (same)
Winner: Acrobat 9 with ClearScan!
With an astonishing 1.16 MB reduction in file size after OCR, Acrobat 9 with ClearScan is the winner. Wow.
Accuracy
Here is a passage from the article:
Let’s see how each of the packages did:
ABBYY Windows
The spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CMAs. It’s used for everything from preliminary strategic plans to financial statements. As with any familiar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alternatives are available, mostsignificantly in itswidespread use as a de facto reporting tool.
The appeal of the spreadsheet as the quickest way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. “Excel is probably the most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” Alok Ajmera, vice-president, professional services withMississauga, Ont.-basedProphixSoftware, says. “There’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want with the data, and it works fairly well in smaller organizations.”
Periodic and complex reporting in processes like revenue management or cost management, however, is where the spreadsheet model really starts to break down.
Acrobat 9 Windows
T he spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CMAs. It’s used for everything from preliminary su·ategic plans to financial statements. As with any farniliar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alternatives are available, most significantly in its widespread use as a de facto reporting tool.
The appeal of tlle spreadsheet as the quickest way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. “Excel is probably tlle most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” AJok Ajmera, vice-president, professional services with Mississauga, Ont.-based Prophix Software, says. “There’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want witll tlle data, and it works fairly well in smaller organizations.”
Periodic and complex reporting in processes like revenue management or cost management, however, is where the spreadsheet model really starts to break down.
Acrobat 9 With ClearScan
The spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CMAs. It’s used for everything from preliminary su·ategic plans to financial statements. As with any farniliar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alternatives are available, most significantly in its widespread use as a de facto reporting tool.
The appeal of tlle spreadsheet as the quickest way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. “Excel is probably tlle most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” AJok Ajmera, vice-president, professional services with Mississauga, Ont.-based Prophix Software, says. “There’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want witll tlle data, and it works fairly well in smaller organizations.”
Periodic and complex reporting in processes like revenue management or cost management, however, is where the spreadsheet model really starts to break down.
ABBYY Mac
The spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CiMAs. It’s used for everything from preliminary strategic plans to financial statements. As with any familiar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alternatives are available, most significantly in its widespread use as a de facto reporting tool.
The appeal of die spreadsheet as the quickest way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. “Excel is probably the most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” Alok Ajmera, vice-president, professional sendees with Mississauga, Ont.-based Prophix Software, says. “There’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want with the data, and it works fairly well in smaller organizations.”
Periodic and complex reporting in processes like revenue management or cost management, however, is where the spreadsheet model really starts to break down.
Acrobat 8 Mac
T he spreadsheet has become the virtual “slide rule” for CMAs. It’s used for everything frorn preliminary strategic plans to financial statements. Aswith any familiar method, it finds its way into numerous situations where better alterna tives are available, most significantly in its widespread use as a de facto reporting tool.
T he appeal of the spreadsheet as the quickest
way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate.
“Excel is probably the most comfortable
environment for a lot of financial professionals,” avaJlaun. JIIU. ’l;)It;IIIULauuy1111l::>WIUC::>PU:C1U uocd::>
a de facto reporting tool. T he appeal of the spreadsheet as the quickest
way to get a report out is not hard to appreciate. “Excel is probably me most comfortable environment for a lot of financial professionals,” AJok Ajmera, vice-president, professional services with Mississauga, Ont.-based Prophix Software, says. “T here’s a very little learning curve, you can effectively do whatever you want with the data, and it works fairly well in smaller organiza tions.”
Periodic and complex reporting in processes like revenue management or cost management, however, is where the spreadsheet model really starts to break down.
Winner: ABBYY FineReader for Mac looks the best to me. Acrobat 8 on the Mac is pretty terrible (in this example anyways).
Conclusion
Is there a “best” choice? It seems that in this example anyways, Adobe Acrobat 9 with ClearScan turned on gives fast results with good OCR while dramatically reducing the file size.
If you don’t really care about speed so much, FineReader produces good OCR results and for ScanSnap users, has the additional benefit of being integrated with ScanSnap Manager.
As with most things, the best software is the one that works the best for you. Have you found similar results? Any other tests of your own to share? Leave a note in the comments.
Читайте также: